Listen to this post
Contractors remove sediment and debris below the Oroville Dam flood control spillway. Dale Kolke/DWR
Contractors remove sediment and debris below the Oroville Dam flood control spillway. Dale Kolke/DWR

Things have appeared relatively quiet at Oroville Dam for the past couple of weeks, but a lot has been happening.  DWR has been clearing debris from the diversion pool and has successfully started up releases through the Hyatt Powerplant, but the drawdown had some negative impacts downstream.  Here is our latest update.

As always, if you find this blog helpful or interesting, please feel free to share it with others who may be interested. And if you would like to be updated when we post a new entry, please add your email on the right or below where it says “stay connected.”

  1. When we last reported, DWR had begun reducing outflow from Oroville in order to facilitate removal of debris from the diversion pool. Outflow reached zero on February 27, and once water had stopped flowing over the principle spillway, the world got a glimpse at the incredible damage that had been done.  See DWR’s amazing footage of the spillway on February 28.  For other videos and drone footage of the dam facilities, see DWR’s Twitter feed.
  2. As reported last week in the San Francisco Chronicle and the Sacramento Bee , it appears that when outflow from the dam was reduce to zero, the resulting “drawdown” of the river downstream led to sloughing of the riverbank in a few areas into the river. This is perhaps an unanticipated impact of the reduced reliability of the spillway – downstream conditions, which for decades have been reliably predictable, changed dramatically at a time when that predictability turns out to be pretty important.
  3. A key reason to remove debris was to allow for the Hyatt power plant, which is located at the base of Oroville Dam, to start releasing water from the lake. This accomplishes two things: (1) it allows for investigation of the principal spillway, which was significantly damaged during February’s high water and outflow events; and (2) it allows for continued releases of water out of the facility, which creates space behind the dam in the event we get surprise storms in March and April.  The Hyatt power plant began releasing water on March 3 at a rate of approximately 2,300 cfs.  As of Monday, March 13, outflow from the plant was up to 12,900 cfs.
  4. DWR intends to resume use of the principal spillway to discharge up to 50,000 cfs by the end of this week, and has advised the public to avoid the river due to this anticipated increase in outflow. DWR has continued to add incredible photos to its photo feed.
  5. While the outflow has been low or nonexistent, crews have removed over one million cubic yards of material from the diversion pool.
  6. A few days before DWR ceased all releases of water over the principal spillway, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) formally expressing concerns about the impacts of reduced flow and dredge-cleaning operations on federally-protected fish in the Feather River, offering “technical assistance” in the form of recommendations to minimize those impacts, and recommending that FERC initiate consultation with NMFS in order to discuss mitigation for any impacts.  While there were efforts by State agencies to rescue impacted fish (see news story about those efforts), the formal reaction to that letter by members of the California Congressional delegation was one of displeasure.  In a letter to President Trump, the members of Congress requested an exemption from the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act for all repair work at the Oroville Dam.
  7. DWR performed its monthly snow survey and reported on March 9 that statewide snow levels were at 168% of the April 1 average, and 179% of normal for this date. This virtually ensures that skiers will enjoy amazing spring conditions for the first time in years.  It also ensures that plenty of water has yet to come down into our reservoirs, including Oroville, through spring.  Whether it comes down quickly due to early warm weather, or at a slower pace, remains to be seen.

We will continue to follow these issues and blog about them over the next few weeks and months.  In particular, we will try to keep readers informed about how and whether the principal spillway might be repaired.

Photo of Andrea P. Clark Andrea P. Clark

Andrea Clark specializes in water rights and flood control, serving as general counsel to a variety of public agencies from local reclamation districts and water districts to regional joint powers authorities.

Public agencies in the water and flood control fields rely on Andrea…

Andrea Clark specializes in water rights and flood control, serving as general counsel to a variety of public agencies from local reclamation districts and water districts to regional joint powers authorities.

Public agencies in the water and flood control fields rely on Andrea for her ability to explain in understandable terms the wide range of issues impacting them, including basic transparency laws (Brown Act and Public Records Act), public bidding and contracting, bond financing, the unique nature of joint powers authorities, and elections. She also regularly counsels clients on water transfers, Proposition 218 compliance, the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and financing strategies for major capital improvement projects.

With a special expertise in flood control and floodplain management, Andrea is regularly asked to speak on topics ranging from flood insurance to climate change and the future of flood control policy in California. Through her representation of clients in state flood policy and speaking engagements, she has forged strong relationships with key members of the flood control community in California.

Andrea also counsels private clients, including landowners and mutual water companies, on water supply matters, including proceedings before the State Water Resources Control Board, water rights determinations, and contractual disputes with Federal agencies.

Photo of Scott L. Shapiro Scott L. Shapiro

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley. He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the…

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley. He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) throughout the Western United States.

With a special focus on massive flood protection improvement projects, Scott advises clients through regulatory, contractual, financing, and legislative challenges. Acting as general or special counsel, he regularly interacts with senior management at USACE (Headquarters, South Pacific Division, and Sacramento District), the California Department of Water Resources, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board. He was named to the National Section 408 Task Force and has been invited to give testimony to the National Academies. Scott was instrumental in helping the first regional flood improvement agency that took a basin threatened by flood risk from less than 30-year level of protection to a level of protection approaching 200-year.

Having worked with FEMA on issues of floodplain mapping and levee accreditation for many years, Scott has developed collaborative environments in which he fosters win-win solutions for his clients. He is also currently serving as the lead counsel on a flood insurance rate map (FIRM) appeal and has drafted Federal legislation to modify the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) several times.

Scott is known throughout the region for his extensive litigation experience focusing on cases arising from levee failures. He has litigated levee failures resulting from underseepage, failed encroachments, and rodent burrows as well as briefing levee overtopping cases at the appellate level. Scott is one of the few attorneys with experience litigating flood cases on behalf of plaintiffs as well as defendant government entities.