The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) Finally to be Considered by the Senate

Great news for those of us tracking the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), which authorizes specific projects, creates and modifies programs, and updates authorities for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:  The Senate has scheduled a a cloture vote on Tuesday.  For those with less background on the inner-workings of the Senate, a cloture vote is a procedural vote to allow only 30 hours of debate on a topic, followed by a vote on a bill.  In this case, if the cloture vote passes then the WRDA bill will be officially voted on at 9:00 pm on Wednesday assuming the Senate is still in session.

You will likely recall that the House recently passed S.3021, which was a pre-conference bill developed jointly by the House and Senate staffers to coordinate the House’s and Senate’s views on what should be in WRDA.  Assuming that the cloture vote passes on Tuesday this all but assures that WRDA will be approved by the Senate and signed by the President before the week’s end.

Here is the notice provided to the Senate’s Democratic Caucus:

Tuesday, October 9, 2018
*   The Senate will convene at 3:00pm and resume consideration of the House message to accompany S.3021, the legislative vehicle for the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (WRDA).
*   The cloture vote on the motion to concur with the House message to accompany S.3021 (WRDA) will occur at 5:30pm. If cloture is invoked, the Senate will begin to burn up to 30 hours post-cloture.

During the Friday and Saturday Sessions
House message to accompany S.3021, the legislative vehicle for the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (WRDA).
*         Senator McConnell moved to concur with the House message to accompany S.3021 and filed cloture on that motion to concur.
o    Senator McConnell filled the amendment tree relative to the House message to accompany S.3021.

USACE Appropriations Bill Signed by President, Becomes Law

Today the President signed an FY2019 “Minibus” into law (HR 5895) covering three of the twelve appropriations areas – energy and water, MilCon/VA, and legislative branch.  The Energy and Water portion funds the activities of USACE’s Civil Works function.  The agreement would provide a total of $7 billion to USACE, $171.5 million more than in fiscal 2018 and $2.21 billion more than requested by the President in his FY2019 Budget.

Our thanks to our friends at Van Scoyoc Associates for this information.  Major allocations for USACE are shown in the table below:

Account (dollars in millions)

Agreement

Vs. FY 2018

Vs. request

Operation and maintenance

$3,739.5

+$109.5

+$1,662.8

Construction

$2,183.0

+$98.0

+$1,311.3

Mississippi River

$368.0

-$57.0

+$123.3

Regulatory program

$200.0

$0.0

$0.0

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FURSAP)

$150.0

+$11.0

+$30.0

Investigations

$125.0

+$2.0

+$43.0

Flood control and coastal emergencies

$35.0

$0.0

$0.0

Other Highlights of the bill include the following:

  • The Act allows for six new study starts in FY2019 – one for navigation, one for flood protection, one for environmental restoration, and three for any authorized purpose.
  • The Act allows for five new construction starts – one for navigation, one for flood protection, one for environmental restoration, and two for any authorized purpose.
  • There is a prohibition on USACE spending any funds on moving elements of USACE to other agencies.
  • The Act clarifies that a new start designation is not needed to move from feasibility phase of a study to preconstruction engineering and design phase (PED).
  • $25M is available for authorized reimbursements to non-federal partners
  • The Act calls for full use of the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and more than 90% use of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
  • The Act allocates $50M for use by Donor and Energy Ports…the full authorized amount.

For all the additional funds provided, USACE has 60 days to produce a Work Plan designating where the money will be allocated in the coming fiscal year, including specific projects and dollar amounts.  At the same time, USACE is preparing its portion of the President’s Budget for FY2020 that will be submitted to Congress in February of next year.

Continue Reading

Federal Funding Panel Shared Interesting Perspectives at Annual FMA Conference

At last week’s Floodplain Management Association meeting in Reno, Nevada, the two of us planned and participated in a panel discussion on federal funding for flood control projects under the Trump administration.  Attendees enjoyed a discussion on federal funding options for local entities that are ready to carry out a flood control project (or any water infrastructure project, really), how some California agencies are strategizing to obtain such funding, and importantly, a perspective from a key staff member at the President’s Office of Management and Budget, which sets and implements the President’s policy and budget. Continue Reading

WRDA, Appropriations, and USACE Is Staying Where It Is (for now, at least): A Busy Few Days on the Hill

All joking aside about a gridlocked Congress, real progress has been made this week on flood risk reduction authorizations and appropriations.  As explained below, it is looking like the 2018 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) may pass shortly, and the relevant budget subcommittees are ready to move an agreed-upon appropriations packet forward to their respective floors as well.  Also, Congress appears to have put a nail in the coffin for any proposal to move USACE to a different Federal department.

Continue Reading

USACE 408 Guidance Is Officially Final (EC 1165-2-220)

We previously reported on and provided what appeared to be final drafts of the new 408 guidance.  On Friday we received the formal version, and are providing access to it here:  EC_1165-2-220.

Keep coming back for more helpful information on legal updates & commentary on flood risk and floodplain management.

USACE Issues Guidance for Use of Supplemental Appropriation

 

We are happy to share the guidance on how USACE should be moving forward with projects funded under the Supplemental Appropriation.  The guidance can be found here.

The appropriation provided an incredible $15 billion for construction:

Public Law 115-123 provides $15,055,000,000 in Construction funding (Supplemental Construction funds) to address emergency situations at Corps of Engineers projects, and to construct, and to rehabilitate and repair damages caused by natural disasters to, Corps projects. Of that amount, $15,000,000,000 is available to construct flood and storm damage reduction projects in States and insular areas (territories) with more than one flood-related major disaster declared pursuant to the Robert T . Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) in calendar years 2014, 2015, 2016, or 2017. Thirty-three states and three territories meet the criteria and are listed in Enclosure 2. Additionally, not less than $10,425,000,000 of the $15,000,000,000 is available for projects within such States and insular areas (territories) that were also impacted by HHIM. The States and territories that meet the criteria and also were also impacted by HHIM are listed in Enclosure 3. Further, Public Law 115-123 provides that all repair, rehabilitation, study, design, and construction of Corps of Engineers projects in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands (USVI), using the Supplemental Construction funds, shall be conducted at full federal expense.

The guidance confirms, in the last sentence of this paragraph, that the funds will allow construction at full federal expense (without a local cost share).  Although, of course, any costs of a locally preferred plan that are in excess of the cost of the National Economic Development Plan for a project will remain the responsibility of the non-Federal sponsor, which must pay such costs during construction of the project.

As always, please check back for more updates on flood protection law and policy.

USACE 408 Guidance May Be Final (EC 1165-2-220)

We have reported many times in the past on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ 408 policy: Here, here, here, here, here, and here. Well, we recently obtained a copy of what appears to be the final guidance, albeit with no date on it.  Also, we can’t find it on any government websites yet.  So, we think this is the final version, but only time will tell.  If anyone knows, please share your thoughts in our reply section below.

The guidance, including attachments, is a very large document.  So we have provided it here in three parts: 2018 408 Guidance 1 of 3, 2018 408 Guidance 2 of 3, and 2018 408 Guidance 3 of 3.

We hope this is helpful.

Will the Army Corps of Engineers lose the Civil Works mission? Looks like the Department of Defense is making some plans.

In late June, President Trump unveiled his administration’s plan to reorganize the federal government.  The proposed shakeup is entitled “Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century: Reform Plan and Reorganization Recommendations.”  On page 15 of the proposal you will find:  “Move the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Civil Works out of the Department of Defense (DOD) to the Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of the Interior (DOI).”  This proposal has left many people asking questions, such as how would it work?  Would it be better?  Does Congress need to approve it?  And how is this different than every other proposal made in the past?  Indeed, during a recent Senate hearing, Senators voiced inquiries about the Department of Defense’s views:

Continue Reading

No Long-Term Reauthorization Yet; NFIP Extended Through November 30, 2018

In a last minute move to avert a mini-financial disaster, today the Senate passed, and the president signed, a bill to extend the NFIP until November 30, 2018.  The House had previously passed a companion bill.  Demonstrating the broad support to keep the program running, the Senate passed the bill 86-12 and the president signed it within hours.

Continue Reading

LexBlog