Listen to this post

Today’s guest-post is from Laura Morgan-Kessler of Van Scoyoc Associates.

It is almost impossible to turn on the news or open your twitter feed today without seeing words like gridlock, partisan, or contentious used to describe the current climate in Washington, D.C. The constant negativity surrounding the events and activities in our nation’s capital has led many to feel disheartened with the political process. However, as has often been the case in Washington, D.C., the times of greatest uncertainly provide the greatest opportunity. A strong federal advocacy effort is exactly what is needed to take advantage of these opportunities.

The idea of federal advocacy started with the birth of our nation. Our Founding Fathers felt that it was important for all citizens to be able to share their views with the newly-formed government. As a result, they included language in the First Amendment that guarantees the people the right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Every day, thousands of Americans walk the halls of Congress and pound the pavement at federal agencies exercising their First Amendment right to petition the government on a wide range of issues including flood control, infrastructure investment, and public safety.

There is a never-ending list of issues being discussed daily in Washington, D.C., and it is important that the issues of greatest concern to your agency, your constituents, or your members remain at the top of the list. Engaging in a robust federal advocacy effort not only ensures that the issues you care about are being discussed at the federal level, but that you have a seat at the table to help shape the policy and regulations that govern these issues.

Your agency or association also has a unique ability to provide feedback to Congress and the federal agencies on how the laws they pass and the regulations they write are being implemented on the ground. Members of the Congress and the Administration need to understand how the decisions they make in Washington, D.C. impact the daily lives of Americans. As the entities on the ground who are living with the day-to-day impacts of the actions in Washington, D.C., you can provide a valuable insight and knowledge on the effectiveness of these laws and regulations.

Decisions are made every day in Washington, D.C. that make new policies and create new opportunities, and it is imperative that decision-makers hear your voice in Washington, D.C. A consistent federal advocacy effort will ensure that you are well-positioned to take advantage of these new opportunities.

You can see Laura’s bio here.

As always, if you wish to receive updates when these blogs are posted, please add your email in the “Stay Connected” section of the page.

Photo of Scott L. Shapiro Scott L. Shapiro

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley. He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the…

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley. He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) throughout the Western United States.

With a special focus on massive flood protection improvement projects, Scott advises clients through regulatory, contractual, financing, and legislative challenges. Acting as general or special counsel, he regularly interacts with senior management at USACE (Headquarters, South Pacific Division, and Sacramento District), the California Department of Water Resources, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board. He was named to the National Section 408 Task Force and has been invited to give testimony to the National Academies. Scott was instrumental in helping the first regional flood improvement agency that took a basin threatened by flood risk from less than 30-year level of protection to a level of protection approaching 200-year.

Having worked with FEMA on issues of floodplain mapping and levee accreditation for many years, Scott has developed collaborative environments in which he fosters win-win solutions for his clients. He is also currently serving as the lead counsel on a flood insurance rate map (FIRM) appeal and has drafted Federal legislation to modify the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) several times.

Scott is known throughout the region for his extensive litigation experience focusing on cases arising from levee failures. He has litigated levee failures resulting from underseepage, failed encroachments, and rodent burrows as well as briefing levee overtopping cases at the appellate level. Scott is one of the few attorneys with experience litigating flood cases on behalf of plaintiffs as well as defendant government entities.