Listen to this post

Today’s guest-post is from Laura Morgan-Kessler of Van Scoyoc Associates.

On Monday, February 12, President Trump formally unveiled his proposed infrastructure package entitled “Legislative Outline for Rebuilding Infrastructure in America.”  The proposal outlined the following main goals:

  • Provide $200 billion in federal funding to spur $1.5 trillion in infrastructure investment
  • Remove regulatory barriers
  • Streamline and shorten permitting for infrastructure projects
  • Increase local authority by allocating funds to projects prioritized by State and local authorities
  • Expand processes that allow environmental review and permitting decisions to be delegated to States
  • Allow Federal agencies to divest assets that can be better managed by State or local governments or the private sector

The $200 billion in proposed federal funding would be divided into several different funding opportunities.  At first review, the federal funding opportunities for flood control projects appears to be limited.  $100 billion would be used to create an Infrastructure Incentives Program.  This newly-created program would aim to incentivize innovative project approaches that will generate revenue, reduce project cost, and improve performance.  Flood control projects are listed as an eligible project category for this program.  Additionally, $50 billion would be used to create a Rural Infrastructure Program.  Funding under this program would be given directly to the states to determine how best to it can be used to address rural infrastructure needs.

The plan does provide some proposed regulatory relief and permit streamlining proposals that could prove to be beneficial for flood control projects. The proposal would create an “one agency, one decision” process for projects that have multiple federal agencies involved in the permitting process.  The plan would establish a lead federal agency that would coordinate permitting with all other federal agencies.  Under this approach, decisions would be reached within 21 months, and the permits issued 3 months later.

The plan includes several other proposed regulatory and permitting changes such as:

  • Amend the law to expand authority for the acceptance of contributed funds even if no federal funds have been appropriated for the authorized project for all authorized WRDA studies and projects
  • Authorize federal agencies to select and use nationwide permits without additional Army Corps of Engineers review
  • Broaden existing authorities to delegate environmental review and permitting responsibilities to States
  • Allow use of one NEPA document for both Section 404 and 408 actions

It is important to note that this proposal is the first step in a long process.  Several committees in both the House and the Senate will have jurisdiction over portions of an infrastructure package, and as a result, it can be expected that many Members of Congress will have strong views on the funding and policy priorities.  Over the coming weeks and months, Congress will likely begin to focus and work on this issue.  It will be important for Members to hear from the flood control community about what types of federal funding opportunities and regulatory changes would be helpful.

You can see Laura’s bio here.

As always, if you wish to receive updates when these blogs are posted, please add your email in the “Stay Connected” section of the page.

 

Photo of Scott L. Shapiro Scott L. Shapiro

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley. He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the…

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley. He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) throughout the Western United States.

With a special focus on massive flood protection improvement projects, Scott advises clients through regulatory, contractual, financing, and legislative challenges. Acting as general or special counsel, he regularly interacts with senior management at USACE (Headquarters, South Pacific Division, and Sacramento District), the California Department of Water Resources, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board. He was named to the National Section 408 Task Force and has been invited to give testimony to the National Academies. Scott was instrumental in helping the first regional flood improvement agency that took a basin threatened by flood risk from less than 30-year level of protection to a level of protection approaching 200-year.

Having worked with FEMA on issues of floodplain mapping and levee accreditation for many years, Scott has developed collaborative environments in which he fosters win-win solutions for his clients. He is also currently serving as the lead counsel on a flood insurance rate map (FIRM) appeal and has drafted Federal legislation to modify the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) several times.

Scott is known throughout the region for his extensive litigation experience focusing on cases arising from levee failures. He has litigated levee failures resulting from underseepage, failed encroachments, and rodent burrows as well as briefing levee overtopping cases at the appellate level. Scott is one of the few attorneys with experience litigating flood cases on behalf of plaintiffs as well as defendant government entities.